Skip to main content

Landis Decision Announced - Appeal Denied!

CyclingNews and other outlets are reporting today that Floyd Landis has lost his appeal to overturn the sanction for his positive drug test from the 2006 Tour de France. The arbitration panel was split 2 to 1, with Christopher Campbell dissenting. 

It is anticipated that ASO, the organizer of the Tour de France, will now officially remove Landis as the winner of the 2006 race and will name Oscar Pereiro in Landis' place. Landis will now be required to serve his 2 year ban, which will likely date from the end of the 2006 Tour (although the New York Times is stating that the ban will be retroactive to January 30th of 2007).

At this point, Landis can either accept the decision of the panel, or he can appeal to the Court of Arbitration for Sport (CAS). He has a month to file the appeal. I would look for it by this time tomorrow. 

The 84 page decision acknowledges that the initial screening test to measure his testosterone levels was not done according to WADA rules, but that the later IRMS test was accurate. Much of Landis' case was based on improper procedures & calibrations related to the IRMS testing at the Chatenay-Malabry lab. The report goes on to state: "...the Panel finds that the practises of the Lab in training its employees appears to lack the vigor the Panel would expect in the circumstances given the enormous consequences to athletes" of an adverse analytical finding. It continues: "If such practises continue, it may well be that in the future, an error like this could result in the dismissal" of a positive finding by the lab. 

This is said to be the reason behind Campbell's dissent. He feels that Landis case should have been one of those dismissed. He goes on to say: "...the T-E ratio test is acknowledged as a simple test to run. The IRMS test is universally acknowledged as a very complicated test to run, requiring much skill. If the LNDD couldn't get the T-E ratio test right, how can a person have any confidence that LNDD got the much more complicated IRMS test correct?" 

Given how the UCI has handled information about positive drug tests in the past, it is no surprise that the UCI's Pat McQuaid was already aware of the decision before it was announced. McQuaid states that "...justice has been done and this is what the UCI felt was correct all along."

Landis states: ''This ruling is a blow to athletes and cyclists everywhere. For the Panel to find in favor of USADA when, with respect to so many issues, USADA did not manage to prove even the most basic parts of their case shows that this system is fundamentally flawed. I am innocent, and we proved I am innocent.''

It is said that Landis spent over $2 million dollars defending his case. There is no doubt that the appeal will cost him even more. Should he, at this point, spend his money on fairness for all athletes or continue to fight for himself? If the ban was to date to the end of the 2006 Tour, I would say yes. He would be able to come back and race in the Vuelta next year. See my previous post for my opinions on this.

Popular posts from this blog

Bikes I Love: The Flyte SRS-2

"Bikes I Love" will be an ongoing feature of Bike World. I'll be posting overviews of race bikes, and trying to look at a variety of news sources and reviews to give a good overall impression of the bike. I'm calling these overviews, not reviews, as I'm not in the position to get my hands on most bikes at this point.

That said, I'm going to start this feature with a review of the Flyte SRS-2. In this case, I can call it a review as I actually own and ride this bike.

Here's how I have the bike set up:
54 cm Flyte SRS-2
Reynolds Ouzo Comp fork
Flyte stem (90mm)
Airborne OS anatomic handlebar
Tacx bottle cages
Ultegra brakes
105 shifters
Ultegra front derailleur
105 rear derailleur
105 cranks
Generic carbon fiber seatpost
Selle Italia saddle
Look Keo Classic pedals
Alex DA-28 wheelset
Michelin Dynamic tires

I purchased my SRS-2 frame directly from Flyte in the Spring of 2006. I was fortunate to work about 4 miles from their former office. The frame was on sale in their "…

Lance Breaks His Silence On The Landis Decision

When first asked a couple of weeks ago about the decision in the Floyd Landis case, Lance Armstrong basically implied that he didn't keep up with cycling anymore and that he didn't have time to look at it.

Now, in a new interview released yesterday, Armstrong blasts the decision of the arbitration panel and states that he feels that Landis would have been exonerated by a jury.

It's about time he spoke up. He may be focused on finding a cure for cancer, but he needs to recognize that for most Americans, he is the person that comes to mind when they think about professional cycling.

Eurobike Looks To Grow

In a press release issued today, the Eurobike Exhibition seems to be looking to grow even larger, with 2 new exhibition halls and additional parking. The full text of the press release is below:
Heavy construction machinery has been put to work now that the expansion of the exhibition grounds is in full swing at the East Entrance. Lord Mayor Josef Buechelmeier, chairman of the Messe Friedrichshafen supervisory board, has given the go-ahead for work to begin on the expansion of the exhibition grounds, scheduled for completion in 2009.

In addition to new parking facilities in the immediate vicinity of the grounds, the expansion plans include the construction of two additional clear-span halls and a new entrance complex complete with seminar and conference facilities. The new exhibition halls are expected to be already available for use in October 2008. The revamped East Entrance, complete with Foyer and conference rooms, will be inaugurated in summer 2009, the Eurobike scheduled…